activeMQ

On-premise CRM is run on computers within the premises of an organization. In this case all the data and information is stored inside the premises of the company, too. Cloud-based CRM software implies that the software and all relevant data, is accessible through the Internet and is displayed in a web browser. According to Gartner, by 2018, large organizations in mature markets will shorten the CRM replacement cycle by two years by moving to Software-as-a-Service model. Nowadays, everything is going into a cloud, and we would recommend not to stand against this. Heroku and Amazon Web Services are proving to have really good system administration and hosting capabilities. Heroku is a bit pricey, but once you subscribe, you can forget about server maintenance at all. Amazon AWS, namely S3 service, will ensure that all your data can be accessible worldwide and with download lightning speed, no matter how many people are calling your CRM server at the same time. Not every company needs to have both applications. However, the combination allows large companies to mix the vital data from each system and get a comprehensive business outlook.

These things vary on the sizing/number of the application transactions and/or hardware considerations for the database. For more details on this you need to request for Database Planning with our support team.

Depending on the type of CRM, there are several options available: Custom modules (sections) and fields. You can create a new section in CRM or remove default unnecessary ones and pick the fields to feature the module. Custom fields. You can create fields of any type (textbox, email, checkbox…) Custom UI/UX design. You can add or reorder the sections and fields on each layout, set up the navigation, add quicklinks. Custom workflow. You can map your processes across the CRM ecosystem, set alerts, data compliance checks, verifications, etc.

In a rough sense, it is similar to the Post-Triggers of the database world. But with functions, the action is already completed at the data-layer, and the event handler just gives an interface by which developers can key in the logic of what needs to happen ‘after’ the action is done. What a function sees is the actual event of the change, and hence it does not directly correlate with Database Triggers.

Another important factor is how easy the system is to use – most likely, the people you’d like to update the site won’t be that technically comfortable, so the best solution is one that has solid usability.

no. That is the biggest myth of CMSs. Most of the time, the real issues in content creation are around people and processes, not the technology. You need to manage your content creation like any other project – with a clear workflow and timetable, and enough people—with the right skills—to handle what you need to create. The CMS will help you get the content on to the site, but the much more difficult challenge is creating it. And computers don’t write very well.